We all know that precious stones are the ones with a high value.

But how does the value of one stone compare to other ancient stones?

A new study by researchers at the University of Oxford has provided an answer.

The study, published in the journal Nature Communications, revealed that, for a variety of reasons, different ancient stones are worth more than others.

First, the stone’s location on the human body makes it the most valuable stone, and therefore most sought after.

Second, the type of stone also has an impact on value.

For example, for one of the oldest known stones, which was discovered in 1735, the researchers found that its value was lower than other stone types, such as quartzite.

These findings provide insight into why certain stones have a higher value than others, says study lead author, Andrew Smith.

The new research is based on measurements taken of the stone over the last four centuries.

The researchers then looked at the relative importance of different stone types over time, to see which stones had a higher or lower value.

What’s more, they also looked at stone types with different sizes.

They discovered that there are differences in the value different stones have in terms of hardness and weight.

For instance, quartzite has a value of about 1,300 to 1,600 grams.

Quartzite is usually softer and lighter than limestone, which has a hardness of about 3,500 to 3,700 grams.

The same stone is also lighter than basalt.

And basalt has a higher melting point and a higher porosity than quartzite, which is lighter and softer.

This could have a big impact on the value a stone might fetch in a sale.

The value of the different stone is linked to a range of other factors, such an age, how it was used and its use in ritual, says Smith.

These factors also have an impact in the price of the stones, he says.

For one thing, there is the fact that the different stones are typically used differently.

This is because they are different materials and have different chemical compositions.

“It’s important to note that the value is not only about the stone, but also about the use, the context in which it was produced, the cultural context in the country where it was made, and so on,” says Smith, adding that this helps us to understand the value.

The scientists used a number of different methods to determine the value each stone has, including its physical characteristics, the types of stones used, the materials used and their age.

They also compared these values to those of other stones that had been found in different locations around the world.

For some stones, they compared their value to those found in the same stone sites.

For others, they used their values against those of a variety that had already been discovered.

This allowed them to determine how much a particular stone was worth at different times.

“If you have a stone that is more valuable than a different one, then that means the value goes up, even if it’s a different type of rock, a different size of stone, a smaller diameter of stone or something like that,” Smith says.

In some cases, the study also showed how the value varied across different cultures.

For stone types found in North Africa, for example, the value for the most common stone was about 2,300 kilograms.

For stones from the Himalayas, the figure was about 3.8 tons.

For more information, visit: http://www.nature.com/ncomms/index.html#ncoms_article.

For the full study, go to: http:/ / www.naturecommons.org/ papers/ ncomms1816.full.html